FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal Pt95Ru5 vs Pt99.95

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal Pt95Ru5 and Pt99.95 are both precious metal grades. Pt95Ru5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Pt99.95, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 140 MPa (20.3 ksi). In exchange, Pt99.95 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 34% for Pt95Ru5, and Pt95Ru5 is harder (124 HB vs 39 HB). Pt95Ru5 is lighter (20.67 g/cm³ vs 21.45 g/cm³ for Pt99.95) and Pt95Ru5 is stiffer (186 GPa vs 168 GPa). On the shop floor, Pt99.95 welds better (excellent vs very good).

Pt95Ru5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Pt99.95Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Pt95Ru5 vs Pt99.95: properties

Pt95Ru5Pt99.95

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
168 GPa24.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

68 GPa9.9 Msi
61 GPa8.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

285 GPa41.3 Msi
230 GPa33.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

34%
40%

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
—

Hardness, Brinell

124 HB
39 HB

Hardness, Vickers

130 HV
41 HV

Reduction in Area

—
90%

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

20.67 g/cm³0.75 lb/in³
21.45 g/cm³0.77 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,780°C3,236 °F
1,768°C3,214 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,795°C3,263 °F
1,768°C3,214 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
71.6 W/m·K41.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

135 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
133 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.1 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F
8.8 µm/m·K4.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

900°C1,652 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 113 J/g48.6 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.6 % IACS
16.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m12.2 µΩ·in
1.06×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.17 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

99 / 100
100 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) 0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
98 / 100

Polishability

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 25% · Castability 55 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240,000 MJ/kg1.03×10⁸ BTU/lb
210,000 MJ/kg9.03×10⁷ BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250,000 L/kg29,957 gal/lb
200,000 L/kg23,965 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 14,000 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

18 kN·m/kg
7 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9 MN·m/kg
7.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

82 kJ/m³
6 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

10.8 mm²/s
25.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePt99.95Pt95Ru5

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPt95Ru5Pt99.95
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Pt95Ru5 vs Pt99.95 — frequently asked

Is Pt95Ru5 stronger than Pt99.95?

Yes. Pt95Ru5 has a typical yield strength of 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Pt99.95 — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 140 MPa (20.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Pt95Ru5 or Pt99.95?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Pt95Ru5 or Pt99.95?

Pt95Ru5, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for Pt99.95; for welding the order is Pt99.95 first (excellent, 90/100) then Pt95Ru5 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Pt95Ru5 and Pt99.95 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.