FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal 92Ag-8SnO2 vs AgSnO2In2O3

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal 92Ag-8SnO2 and AgSnO2In2O3 are both precious metal grades. AgSnO2In2O3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 92Ag-8SnO2, about 86% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi). In exchange, 92Ag-8SnO2 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 9% for AgSnO2In2O3, and AgSnO2In2O3 is harder (90 HB vs 57 HB). 92Ag-8SnO2 conducts electricity better (82 % IACS vs 66 % IACS).

92Ag-8SnO2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AgSnO2In2O3Choose it when strength drives the design.

92Ag-8SnO2 vs AgSnO2In2O3: properties

92Ag-8SnO2AgSnO2In2O3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
104 GPa15.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

225 MPa32.6 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
9%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

57 HB
90 HB

Hardness, Vickers

60 HV
95 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 88 GPa12.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 32 GPa4.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.37

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.1 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³
9.95 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

961°C1,762 °F
960°C1,760 °F

Liquidus Temperature

961°C1,762 °F
962°C1,764 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

345 W/m·K199 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

100 J/g43 BTU/lb
95 J/g40.8 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 240 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

82 % IACS
66 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.827 µΩ·in
2.61×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.03 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.05 V
0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
—

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,450 MJ/kg623,388 BTU/lb
1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

110 kg CO₂/kg
130 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

2,000 L/kg240 gal/lb
25,000 L/kg2,996 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

22 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.7 MN·m/kg
8.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

69 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

142.3 mm²/s
134 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

46
58

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgSnO2In2O392Ag-8SnO2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability92Ag-8SnO2AgSnO2In2O3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

92Ag-8SnO2 vs AgSnO2In2O3 — frequently asked

Is AgSnO2In2O3 stronger than 92Ag-8SnO2?

Yes. AgSnO2In2O3 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 92Ag-8SnO2 — about 86% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 92Ag-8SnO2 or AgSnO2In2O3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 92Ag-8SnO2 or AgSnO2In2O3?

92Ag-8SnO2, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for AgSnO2In2O3; for welding the order is AgSnO2In2O3 first (poor, 30/100) then 92Ag-8SnO2 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 92Ag-8SnO2 and AgSnO2In2O3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.