FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal 80Ag-20CdO vs AgSnO2In2O3

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal 80Ag-20CdO and AgSnO2In2O3 are both precious metal grades. AgSnO2In2O3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) for 80Ag-20CdO, about 52% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi). In exchange, 80Ag-20CdO is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 9% for AgSnO2In2O3, and AgSnO2In2O3 is harder (90 HB vs 66 HB).

80Ag-20CdOChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AgSnO2In2O3Choose it when strength drives the design.

80Ag-20CdO vs AgSnO2In2O3: properties

80Ag-20CdOAgSnO2In2O3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

85 GPa12.3 Msi
88 GPa12.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
32 GPa4.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
104 GPa15.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

135 MPa19.6 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
9%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
—

Hardness, Brinell

66 HB
90 HB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
95 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.9 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³
9.95 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

961°C1,762 °F
960°C1,760 °F

Liquidus Temperature

961°C1,762 °F
962°C1,764 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

305 W/m·K176 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

235 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
240 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

84 J/g36.1 BTU/lb
95 J/g40.8 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 250°C482 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

73 % IACS
66 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.36×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.929 µΩ·in
2.61×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.03 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) 0.1 V · Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
—

Weldability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,450 MJ/kg623,388 BTU/lb
1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
40%

Embodied Water

—
25,000 L/kg2,996 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 130 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.6 MN·m/kg
8.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

107 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

131.1 mm²/s
134 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

53
58

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgSnO2In2O380Ag-20CdO

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability80Ag-20CdOAgSnO2In2O3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

80Ag-20CdO vs AgSnO2In2O3 — frequently asked

Is AgSnO2In2O3 stronger than 80Ag-20CdO?

Yes. AgSnO2In2O3 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) for 80Ag-20CdO — about 52% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 80Ag-20CdO or AgSnO2In2O3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 80Ag-20CdO or AgSnO2In2O3?

80Ag-20CdO, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for AgSnO2In2O3; for welding the order is 80Ag-20CdO first (fair, 35/100) then AgSnO2In2O3 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 80Ag-20CdO and AgSnO2In2O3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.