FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal 85Pt-15Ir vs AgSnO2In2O3

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal 85Pt-15Ir and AgSnO2In2O3 are both precious metal grades. 85Pt-15Ir is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for AgSnO2In2O3, about 71% more. 85Pt-15Ir is the more ductile: elongation 27% versus 9% for AgSnO2In2O3, and 85Pt-15Ir is harder (160 HV vs 95 HV). AgSnO2In2O3 is lighter (9.95 g/cm³ vs 21.6 g/cm³ for 85Pt-15Ir) and 85Pt-15Ir is stiffer (205 GPa vs 88 GPa). On the shop floor, AgSnO2In2O3 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 85Pt-15Ir welds better (very good vs poor).

85Pt-15IrChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AgSnO2In2O3Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

85Pt-15Ir vs AgSnO2In2O3: properties

85Pt-15IrAgSnO2In2O3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
88 GPa12.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
32 GPa4.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

255 GPa37 Msi
104 GPa15.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

27%
9%

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

84 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
95 HV

Hardness, Brinell

—
90 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

21.6 g/cm³0.78 lb/in³
9.95 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,790°C3,254 °F
960°C1,760 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,825°C3,317 °F
962°C1,764 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

131 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
240 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

122 J/g52.5 BTU/lb
95 J/g40.8 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,000°C1,832 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6.2 % IACS
66 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in
2.61×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.03 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.25 V
0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

100 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
—

Weldability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

92 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

260,000 MJ/kg1.12×10⁸ BTU/lb
1,500 MJ/kg644,885 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16,000 kg CO₂/kg
130 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250,000 L/kg29,957 gal/lb
25,000 L/kg2,996 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

22 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.5 MN·m/kg
8.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

98 kJ/m³
239 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.2 mm²/s
134 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
58

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgSnO2In2O385Pt-15Ir

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability85Pt-15IrAgSnO2In2O3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

85Pt-15Ir vs AgSnO2In2O3 — frequently asked

Is 85Pt-15Ir stronger than AgSnO2In2O3?

Yes. 85Pt-15Ir has a typical tensile strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for AgSnO2In2O3 — about 71% more.

Which is cheaper, 85Pt-15Ir or AgSnO2In2O3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 85Pt-15Ir or AgSnO2In2O3?

AgSnO2In2O3. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (25/100) for 85Pt-15Ir; for welding the order is 85Pt-15Ir first (very good, 70/100) then AgSnO2In2O3 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 85Pt-15Ir and AgSnO2In2O3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.