FabDigitFabDigit

GF Nylon-Like vs PP-Like

Polyurethane · grade comparison

GF Nylon-Like and PP-Like are both polyurethane grades, both rigid pu. GF Nylon-Like is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 36 MPa (5.22 ksi) for PP-Like, about 67% more. In exchange, PP-Like is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 5% for GF Nylon-Like, and GF Nylon-Like is harder (85 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). PP-Like is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.4 g/cm³ for GF Nylon-Like) and GF Nylon-Like is stiffer (4 GPa vs 1.3 GPa). On the shop floor, PP-Like sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than GF Nylon-Like (standard, $$).

GF Nylon-LikeChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PP-LikeChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

GF Nylon-Like vs PP-Like: properties

GF Nylon-LikePP-Like

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
36 MPa5.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
40%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Flexural Strength

92 MPa13.3 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.2 GPa0.61 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
100 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.46 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
2 GPa0.35 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Shear Strength

—
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
1.8 MPa·√m1.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
55 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

95°C203 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F
120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
50°C122 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

105°C221 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
45°C113 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
70°C158 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.8
3.6

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
500 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.03 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
—

Weldability

—
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
8 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

43 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.9 MN·m/kg
1.1 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polyurethane grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

71015203050701.11.21.31.4Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePP-LikeGF Nylon-Like

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGF Nylon-LikePP-Like
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Urethane casting.

GF Nylon-Like vs PP-Like — frequently asked

Is GF Nylon-Like stronger than PP-Like?

Yes. GF Nylon-Like has a typical tensile strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 36 MPa (5.22 ksi) for PP-Like — about 67% more.

Which is cheaper, GF Nylon-Like or PP-Like?

PP-Like is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while GF Nylon-Like is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose GF Nylon-Like over PP-Like?

Pick GF Nylon-Like when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat. Pick PP-Like when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in GF Nylon-Like and PP-Like side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.