FabDigitFabDigit

ABS-Like FR vs PP-Like

Polyurethane · grade comparison

ABS-Like FR and PP-Like are both polyurethane grades, both rigid pu. ABS-Like FR is the stronger of the two: yield strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for PP-Like, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 36 MPa (5.22 ksi). In exchange, PP-Like is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 9% for ABS-Like FR. ABS-Like FR is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 1.3 GPa) and ABS-Like FR runs hotter in service (70°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, ABS-Like FR machines more easily (very good vs good) and PP-Like sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ABS-Like FR (standard, $$).

ABS-Like FRChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PP-LikeChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ABS-Like FR vs PP-Like: properties

ABS-Like FRPP-Like

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
36 MPa5.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
40%

Compressive Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Flexural Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

104 HRR
100 HRR

Shear Modulus

—
0.46 GPa0.07 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
2 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

—
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
1.8 MPa·√m1.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
55 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.17 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.35%
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
50°C122 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

72°C162 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

58°C136 °F
45°C113 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

28%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

100°C212 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.6 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.03 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 500 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
8 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.15%
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

43 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
1.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

440 kJ/m³
346 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polyurethane grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

71015203050701.11.21.31.4Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABS-Like FRPP-Like

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABS-Like FRPP-Like
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Urethane casting.

ABS-Like FR vs PP-Like — frequently asked

Is ABS-Like FR stronger than PP-Like?

Yes. ABS-Like FR has a typical yield strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for PP-Like — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 36 MPa (5.22 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS-Like FR or PP-Like?

PP-Like is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ABS-Like FR is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS-Like FR or PP-Like?

ABS-Like FR. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for PP-Like; for welding the order is ABS-Like FR first (not recommended, 10/100) then PP-Like (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS-Like FR and PP-Like side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.