FabDigitFabDigit

TPA (PEBA) vs TPU-Caprolactone

Polymer · grade comparison

TPA (PEBA) and TPU-Caprolactone are both polymer grades. TPA (PEBA) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for TPU-Caprolactone, about 16% more. In exchange, TPU-Caprolactone is the more ductile: elongation 550% versus 430% for TPA (PEBA), and TPA (PEBA) is harder (60 Shore D vs 35 Shore D). TPA (PEBA) is lighter (1.01 g/cm³ vs 1.2 g/cm³ for TPU-Caprolactone) and TPA (PEBA) is stiffer (0.22 GPa vs 0.03 GPa). On the shop floor, TPU-Caprolactone welds better (excellent vs very good) and TPU-Caprolactone sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than TPA (PEBA) (high, $$$$).

TPA (PEBA)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

TPU-CaprolactoneChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

TPA (PEBA) vs TPU-Caprolactone: properties

TPA (PEBA)TPU-Caprolactone

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

430%
550%

Flexural Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

950 J/m17.8 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore A

95 Shore A
86 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
35 Shore D

Tear Strength

120 kN/m685 lbf/in
85 kN/m485 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

45%
30%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.01 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

165°C329 °F
195°C383 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-55°C-67 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.6% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,000 J/kg·K0.48 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
175 µm/m·K97.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
85°C185 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

55°C131 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

40°C104 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
68°C154 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 21% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
5

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹² Ω

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.05

Same in both: Volume Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.9%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
210°C410 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb
125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

51 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
2

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTPA (PEBA)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTPA (PEBA)TPU-Caprolactone
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

TPA (PEBA) vs TPU-Caprolactone — frequently asked

Is TPA (PEBA) stronger than TPU-Caprolactone?

Yes. TPA (PEBA) has a typical tensile strength of 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for TPU-Caprolactone — about 16% more.

Which is cheaper, TPA (PEBA) or TPU-Caprolactone?

TPU-Caprolactone is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while TPA (PEBA) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, TPA (PEBA) or TPU-Caprolactone?

TPU-Caprolactone, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for TPA (PEBA); for welding the order is TPU-Caprolactone first (excellent, 85/100) then TPA (PEBA) (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in TPA (PEBA) and TPU-Caprolactone side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.