FabDigitFabDigit

SPF vs Viscoelastic PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

SPF and Viscoelastic PU Foam are both polymer grades. SPF is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.3 MPa (0.0435 ksi) against 0.1 MPa (0.0145 ksi) for Viscoelastic PU Foam, about 200% more. In exchange, Viscoelastic PU Foam is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 8% for SPF. SPF is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.05 g/cm³ for Viscoelastic PU Foam) and SPF is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 2.5×10⁻⁴ GPa). On the shop floor, SPF machines more easily (excellent vs good), Viscoelastic PU Foam welds better (poor vs not recommended), and SPF sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Viscoelastic PU Foam (premium, $$$).

SPFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Viscoelastic PU FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

SPF vs Viscoelastic PU Foam: properties

SPFViscoelastic PU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.5×10⁻⁴ GPa3.63×10⁻⁵ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.3 MPa0.04 ksi
0.1 MPa0.01 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
150%

Compressive Strength

0.2 MPa0.03 ksi
0 MPa5.08×10⁻⁴ ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa8.7×10⁻⁴ Msi
3×10⁻⁵ GPa4.35×10⁻⁶ Msi

Flexural Strength

0.35 MPa0.05 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

0.01 GPa8.7×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Shear Strength

0.18 MPa0.03 ksi
0.05 MPa0.01 ksi

Tear Strength

—
0.35 kN/m2 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
8%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

110°C230 °F
15°C59 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.5%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

4%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.02 W/m·K0.01 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
—

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
19%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 90°C194 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.1
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
62 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

15 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

5 / 100
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

45°C113 °F
—

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
50°C122 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

9 kN·m/kg
2 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.5 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySPFViscoelastic PU Foam
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

SPF vs Viscoelastic PU Foam — frequently asked

Is SPF stronger than Viscoelastic PU Foam?

Yes. SPF has a typical tensile strength of 0.3 MPa (0.0435 ksi) against 0.1 MPa (0.0145 ksi) for Viscoelastic PU Foam — about 200% more.

Which is cheaper, SPF or Viscoelastic PU Foam?

SPF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Viscoelastic PU Foam is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, SPF or Viscoelastic PU Foam?

SPF. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (60/100) for Viscoelastic PU Foam; for welding the order is Viscoelastic PU Foam first (poor, 30/100) then SPF (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SPF and Viscoelastic PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.