FabDigitFabDigit

HR Foam vs Viscoelastic PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

HR Foam and Viscoelastic PU Foam are both polymer grades. HR Foam is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) against 0.1 MPa (0.0145 ksi) for Viscoelastic PU Foam, about 30% more. In exchange, Viscoelastic PU Foam is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 130% for HR Foam. HR Foam is lighter (0.05 g/cm³ vs 0.05 g/cm³ for Viscoelastic PU Foam) and Viscoelastic PU Foam is stiffer (2.5×10⁻⁴ GPa vs 2×10⁻⁵ GPa). On the shop floor, HR Foam machines more easily (excellent vs good), HR Foam welds better (fair vs poor), and HR Foam sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Viscoelastic PU Foam (premium, $$$).

HR FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Viscoelastic PU FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

HR Foam vs Viscoelastic PU Foam: properties

HR FoamViscoelastic PU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2×10⁻⁵ GPa2.9×10⁻⁶ Msi
2.5×10⁻⁴ GPa3.63×10⁻⁵ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.15
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.13 MPa0.02 ksi
0.1 MPa0.01 ksi

Elongation at Break

130%
150%

Compressive Strength

0 MPa6.53×10⁻⁴ ksi
0 MPa5.08×10⁻⁴ ksi

Compressive Modulus

2×10⁻⁵ GPa2.9×10⁻⁶ Msi
3×10⁻⁵ GPa4.35×10⁻⁶ Msi

Tear Strength

0.4 kN/m2.3 lbf/in
0.35 kN/m2 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

5%
8%

Shear Strength

—
0.05 MPa0.01 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-55°C-67 °F
15°C59 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
19%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (short-term) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
62 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
50°C122 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3 kN·m/kg
2 kN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
0.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHR FoamViscoelastic PU Foam
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

HR Foam vs Viscoelastic PU Foam — frequently asked

Is HR Foam stronger than Viscoelastic PU Foam?

Yes. HR Foam has a typical tensile strength of 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) against 0.1 MPa (0.0145 ksi) for Viscoelastic PU Foam — about 30% more.

Which is cheaper, HR Foam or Viscoelastic PU Foam?

HR Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Viscoelastic PU Foam is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HR Foam or Viscoelastic PU Foam?

HR Foam. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (60/100) for Viscoelastic PU Foam; for welding the order is HR Foam first (fair, 40/100) then Viscoelastic PU Foam (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HR Foam and Viscoelastic PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.