FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC vs PVC 1120

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC and PVC 1120 are both polymer grades. CPVC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PVC 1120, about 6% more. In exchange, PVC 1120 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 25% for CPVC. PVC 1120 is lighter (1.41 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for CPVC) and CPVC runs hotter in service (93°C vs 60°C continuous). On the shop floor, PVC 1120 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CPVC (standard, $$).

CPVCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PVC 1120Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CPVC vs PVC 1120: properties

CPVCPVC 1120

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
60%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
66 MPa9.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
38 MPa5.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
115 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.67 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Hardness, Shore D 82 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.25%
0.2%

Refractive Index

1.55
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
66 µm/m·K36.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
60°C140 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

103°C217 °F
72°C162 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
45%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
0.018

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.3%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
190°C374 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
40°C104 °F

Same in both: Machinability 75 / 100 · Formability (cold) 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
3%

Same in both: Embodied Water 180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
37 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

451 kJ/m³
431 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC 1120CPVC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVCPVC 1120
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

CPVC vs PVC 1120 — frequently asked

Is CPVC stronger than PVC 1120?

Yes. CPVC has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PVC 1120 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, CPVC or PVC 1120?

PVC 1120 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CPVC is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, CPVC or PVC 1120?

CPVC. Its weldability rates good (65/100) against good (60/100) for PVC 1120.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC and PVC 1120 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.