FabDigitFabDigit

PSU CF30 vs PSU GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PSU CF30 and PSU-GF30 are both polymer grades, compared here in the CF30 condition. PSU CF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) for PSU-GF30, about 44% more. In exchange, PSU-GF30 is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 1.7% for PSU CF30. PSU CF30 is lighter (1.43 g/cm³ vs 1.49 g/cm³ for PSU-GF30) and PSU CF30 is stiffer (18 GPa vs 8.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PSU-GF30 welds better (fair vs poor).

PSU CF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PSU-GF30Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PSU CF30 vs PSU-GF30: properties

PSU CF30PSU-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

18 GPa2.6 Msi
8.8 GPa1.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
108 MPa15.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

1.7%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

14 GPa2 Msi
7.5 GPa1.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

16 GPa2.3 Msi
8.3 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

95 HRM
92 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
122 HRR

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.43 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.49 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.55%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.633
—

Light Transmission

75%
—

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 185°C365 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.22%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.6 W/m·K0.35 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14 µm/m·K7.8 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

190°C374 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

185°C365 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 165°C329 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F · Vicat Softening Point (B50) 188°C370 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 32% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 190°C374 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.03
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.005
0.006

Volume Resistivity

10,000 Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

100,000 Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

84 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.15%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

6.5 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 355°C671 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 145°C293 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

175 MJ/kg75,237 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePSU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPSU CF30PSU-GF30
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionMedical Grade—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PSU CF30 vs PSU-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PSU CF30 stronger than PSU-GF30?

Yes. PSU CF30 has a typical tensile strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) for PSU-GF30 — about 44% more.

Which is cheaper, PSU CF30 or PSU-GF30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PSU CF30 or PSU-GF30?

PSU CF30. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for PSU-GF30; for welding the order is PSU-GF30 first (fair, 40/100) then PSU CF30 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PSU CF30 and PSU-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.