FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PSU-GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PSU-GF30 are both polymer grades. PSU-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) for ABS, about 151% more. In exchange, ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 2.5% for PSU-GF30. ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.49 g/cm³ for PSU-GF30) and PSU-GF30 is stiffer (8.8 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs fair), ABS welds better (very good vs fair), and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PSU-GF30 (high, $$$$).

ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PSU-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ABS vs PSU-GF30: properties

ABSPSU-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
8.8 GPa1.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
108 MPa15.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

25%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
7.5 GPa1.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
8.3 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
122 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
92 HRM

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.49 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
185°C365 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
165°C329 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
180°C356 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
188°C370 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
190°C374 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.006

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
150 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
50 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
355°C671 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
145°C293 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
5.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPSU-GF30
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs PSU-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PSU-GF30 stronger than ABS?

Yes. PSU-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) for ABS — about 151% more.

Which is cheaper, ABS or PSU-GF30?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PSU-GF30 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PSU-GF30?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (50/100) for PSU-GF30; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then PSU-GF30 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PSU-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.