FabDigitFabDigit

PPSU-GF30 vs PSU-GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PPSU-GF30 and PSU-GF30 are both polymer grades. PPSU-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) for PSU-GF30, about 16% more. PSU-GF30 is lighter (1.49 g/cm³ vs 1.56 g/cm³ for PPSU-GF30) and PPSU-GF30 runs hotter in service (180°C vs 165°C continuous).

PPSU-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PSU-GF30Choose it when weight is the constraint.

PPSU-GF30 vs PSU-GF30: properties

PPSU-GF30PSU-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
8.8 GPa1.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
108 MPa15.7 ksi

Compressive Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

8 GPa1.2 Msi
7.5 GPa1.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Shear Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.2 MPa·√m2.9 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
85 J/m1.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

90 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

98 HRM
92 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Same in both: Elongation at Break 2.5% · Flexural Modulus 8.3 GPa1.2 Msi · Hardness, Rockwell R 122 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.56 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.49 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

220°C428 °F
185°C365 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.8%
0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
165°C329 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

220°C428 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

214°C417 °F
180°C356 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

224°C435 °F
188°C370 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

40%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

210°C410 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.9
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.008
0.006

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 19 kV/mm483 V/mil · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

9 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

370°C698 °F
355°C671 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

150°C302 °F
145°C293 °F

Same in both: Weldability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

160 MJ/kg68,788 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8.5 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.8 MN·m/kg
5.9 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPPSU-GF30PSU-GF30
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PPSU-GF30 vs PSU-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PPSU-GF30 stronger than PSU-GF30?

Yes. PPSU-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) for PSU-GF30 — about 16% more.

Which is cheaper, PPSU-GF30 or PSU-GF30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PPSU-GF30 or PSU-GF30?

PPSU-GF30. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for PSU-GF30.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PPSU-GF30 and PSU-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.