FabDigitFabDigit

PBI vs PPS

Polymer · grade comparison

PBI and PPS are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PBI is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PPS, about 105% more. In exchange, PPS is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for PBI. PBI is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.35 g/cm³ for PPS) and PBI is stiffer (5.9 GPa vs 3.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PPS machines more easily (good vs fair) and PPS welds better (poor vs not recommended).

PBIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PPSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

PBI vs PPS: properties

PBIPPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

5.9 GPa0.86 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

160 MPa23.2 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
5%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

5.8 GPa0.84 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Flexural Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

6.5 GPa0.94 Msi
3.9 GPa0.57 Msi

Shear Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

32 J/m0.6 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

125 HRM
95 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Hardness, Shore D

—
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
123 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

427°C801 °F
88°C190 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.03%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

5%
0.1%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
280°C536 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

310°C590 °F
220°C428 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

435°C815 °F
110°C230 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

58%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

500°C932 °F
260°C500 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
240°C464 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.0013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
175 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
320°C608 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
140°C284 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Embodied Energy (primary production)

—
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

—
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

4.5 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePBIPPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBIPPS
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PBI vs PPS — frequently asked

Is PBI stronger than PPS?

Yes. PBI has a typical tensile strength of 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PPS — about 105% more.

Which is cheaper, PBI or PPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PBI or PPS?

PPS. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (50/100) for PBI; for welding the order is PPS first (poor, 30/100) then PBI (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBI and PPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.