FabDigitFabDigit

POM-C+PTFE vs POM-C UV

Polymer · grade comparison

POM-C+PTFE and POM-C UV are both polymer grades. POM-C UV is the stronger of the two: yield strength 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for POM-C+PTFE, about 37% more; tensile strength follows at 64 MPa (9.28 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). POM-C UV is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 20% for POM-C+PTFE. POM-C UV is lighter (1.41 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for POM-C+PTFE). On the shop floor, POM-C UV welds better (fair vs not recommended) and POM-C UV sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than POM-C+PTFE (premium, $$$).

POM-C UVChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

POM-C+PTFE vs POM-C UV: properties

POM-C+PTFEPOM-C UV

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.58 Msi
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
64 MPa9.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

46 MPa6.7 ksi
63 MPa9.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
30%

Compressive Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Flexural Strength

62 MPa9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.5 GPa0.36 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in
65 J/m1.2 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

79 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

78 HRM
80 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
118 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1 GPa0.15 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.38

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.7%
0.8%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 166°C331 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

150°C302 °F
155°C311 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

95°C203 °F
98°C208 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

152°C306 °F
155°C311 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

16%
15%

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.7
3.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.005
0.006

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
88 / 100

Weldability

12 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.9%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 200°C392 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
96 MJ/kg41,273 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
4.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.8 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

392 kJ/m³
709 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM-C+PTFEPOM-C UV

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPOM-C+PTFEPOM-C UV
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

POM-C+PTFE vs POM-C UV — frequently asked

Is POM-C UV stronger than POM-C+PTFE?

Yes. POM-C UV has a typical yield strength of 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for POM-C+PTFE — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 64 MPa (9.28 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, POM-C+PTFE or POM-C UV?

POM-C UV is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while POM-C+PTFE is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, POM-C+PTFE or POM-C UV?

POM-C UV. Its weldability rates fair (35/100) against not recommended (12/100) for POM-C+PTFE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM-C+PTFE and POM-C UV side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.