POM-C UV vs POM-H
Polymer · grade comparison
POM-C UV and POM-H are both polymer grades. POM-H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) for POM-C UV, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 64 MPa (9.28 ksi). POM-H is harder — 86 Shore D against 81 Shore D for POM-C UV — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. POM-H is stiffer (3.1 GPa vs 2.8 GPa).
POM-HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.
POM-C UV vs POM-H: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Compressive Strength
Compressive Modulus
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Shear Strength
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Izod Impact, Notched
Hardness, Shore D
Hardness, Rockwell M
Hardness, Rockwell R
Same in both: Elongation at Break 30%
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Temperature (Tm)
Water Absorption (24 h)
Water Absorption (Saturation)
Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa
Vicat Softening Point (B50)
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 15% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Resistivity
Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)
Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)
Volume Resistivity
Surface Resistivity
Same in both: Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
UV / Weathering Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Polishability
Mold Shrinkage
Melt Flow Rate
Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)
Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | POM-C UV | POM-H |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | — | Yes |
| Sheet metal | — | Yes |
| Injection molding | — | Yes |
| Default condition | — | Unfilled |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$ Standard |
| Min. machined wall | — | 0.5 mm |
| Best machined surface | — | Ra 0.8 µm |
| Chrome Plating (Plastic) | — | Yes |
| EMI Shielding Coating | — | Yes |
| Painting | — | Yes |
| Soft Touch Coating | — | Yes |
| Spray Painting | — | Yes |
| UV Coating | — | Yes |
POM-C UV vs POM-H — frequently asked
Is POM-H stronger than POM-C UV?
Yes. POM-H has a typical yield strength of 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) for POM-C UV — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 64 MPa (9.28 ksi).
Which is cheaper, POM-C UV or POM-H?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which welds better, POM-C UV or POM-H?
POM-H. Its weldability rates fair (40/100) against fair (35/100) for POM-C UV.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM-C UV and POM-H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.