FabDigitFabDigit

POM-C ESD vs POM-C+PTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

POM-C ESD and POM-C+PTFE are both polymer grades. POM-C ESD is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for POM-C+PTFE, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). In exchange, POM-C+PTFE is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 12% for POM-C ESD. POM-C ESD is lighter (1.44 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for POM-C+PTFE) and POM-C ESD is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.7 GPa). On the shop floor, POM-C ESD welds better (fair vs not recommended).

POM-C ESDChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

POM-C+PTFEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

POM-C ESD vs POM-C+PTFE: properties

POM-C ESDPOM-C+PTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
1 GPa0.15 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
46 MPa6.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
20%

Compressive Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

80 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
115 HRR

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.58 Msi · Hardness, Rockwell M 78 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.44 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.75%
0.7%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 166°C331 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.38 W/m·K0.22 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

100°C212 °F
95°C203 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

155°C311 °F
152°C306 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

15%
16%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F · Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa 150°C302 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

10 Ω·m3.94×10⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1,000 Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

10,000 Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Dielectric Strength

—
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.005

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
68 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
12 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
1.9%

Melt Flow Rate

9 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

195°C383 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 25 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

391 kJ/m³
392 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM-C+PTFEPOM-C ESD

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPOM-C ESDPOM-C+PTFE
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

POM-C ESD vs POM-C+PTFE — frequently asked

Is POM-C ESD stronger than POM-C+PTFE?

Yes. POM-C ESD has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for POM-C+PTFE — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, POM-C ESD or POM-C+PTFE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, POM-C ESD or POM-C+PTFE?

POM-C+PTFE. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for POM-C ESD; for welding the order is POM-C ESD first (fair, 35/100) then POM-C+PTFE (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM-C ESD and POM-C+PTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.