FabDigitFabDigit

POM-C vs POM-C+PTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

POM-C and POM-C+PTFE are both polymer grades. POM-C is the stronger of the two: yield strength 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for POM-C+PTFE, about 37% more; tensile strength follows at 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). POM-C is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 20% for POM-C+PTFE. POM-C is lighter (1.41 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for POM-C+PTFE). On the shop floor, POM-C welds better (fair vs not recommended) and POM-C sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than POM-C+PTFE (premium, $$$).

POM-CChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

POM-C vs POM-C+PTFE: properties

POM-CPOM-C+PTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
1 GPa0.15 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.46 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

63 MPa9.1 ksi
46 MPa6.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
20%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

91 MPa13.2 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

81 Shore D
79 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

80 HRM
78 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

119 HRR
115 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.22%
0.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.8%
0.7%

Refractive Index

1.48
—

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 166°C331 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

158°C316 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

105°C221 °F
95°C203 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

158°C316 °F
152°C306 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

16%
16%

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.7 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.005 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
68 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
1.9%

Melt Flow Rate

9 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 200°C392 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.9 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

709 kJ/m³
392 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM-CPOM-C+PTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPOM-CPOM-C+PTFE
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

POM-C vs POM-C+PTFE — frequently asked

Is POM-C stronger than POM-C+PTFE?

Yes. POM-C has a typical yield strength of 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 46 MPa (6.67 ksi) for POM-C+PTFE — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, POM-C or POM-C+PTFE?

POM-C is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while POM-C+PTFE is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, POM-C or POM-C+PTFE?

POM-C. Its weldability rates fair (35/100) against not recommended (12/100) for POM-C+PTFE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM-C and POM-C+PTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.