FabDigitFabDigit

POE Foam vs XPP

Polymer · grade comparison

POE Foam and XPP are both polymer grades. POE Foam is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 2 MPa (0.261 ksi) against 0.65 MPa (0.0943 ksi) for XPP, about 177% more. POE Foam is the more ductile: elongation 220% versus 25% for XPP. XPP is lighter (0.06 g/cm³ vs 0.15 g/cm³ for POE Foam) and XPP is stiffer (0.02 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, XPP welds better (very good vs good).

POE FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

XPPChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

POE Foam vs XPP: properties

POE FoamXPP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2 MPa0.26 ksi
0.65 MPa0.09 ksi

Elongation at Break

220%
25%

Compressive Strength

0.09 MPa0.01 ksi
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

35 Shore A
—

Tear Strength

4 kN/m22.8 lbf/in
2 kN/m9.1 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

25%
12%

Shear Modulus

—
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Flexural Strength

—
0.55 MPa0.08 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

—
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.15

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.15 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³
0.06 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

62°C144 °F
163°C325 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-52°C-62 °F
-10°C14 °F

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.5% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.05 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
130°C266 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.3
1.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

4×10⁻⁴
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
25 / 100

Corrosion Resistance

—
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
85 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
—

Melt Flow Rate

1 g/10 min
2.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
190°C374 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

165°C329 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

88 MJ/kg37,833 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
2.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

12 kN·m/kg
11 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPOE FoamXPP
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

POE Foam vs XPP — frequently asked

Is POE Foam stronger than XPP?

Yes. POE Foam has a typical tensile strength of 2 MPa (0.261 ksi) against 0.65 MPa (0.0943 ksi) for XPP — about 177% more.

Which is cheaper, POE Foam or XPP?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, POE Foam or XPP?

XPP. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for POE Foam.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POE Foam and XPP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.