FabDigitFabDigit

PMP vs POM

Polymer · grade comparison

PMP and POM are both polymer grades. POM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for PMP, about 158% more; tensile strength follows at 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi). POM is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 20% for PMP, and POM is harder (81 Shore D vs 70 Shore D). PMP is lighter (0.83 g/cm³ vs 1.41 g/cm³ for POM) and POM is stiffer (2.8 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, POM machines more easily (excellent vs good) and POM sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PMP (high, $$$$).

PMPChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

POMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PMP vs POM: properties

PMPPOM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

25 MPa3.6 ksi
63 MPa9.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
30%

Flexural Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in
70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

70 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

85 HRR
120 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.45 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Shear Strength

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
80 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.83 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

235°C455 °F
166°C331 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

30°C86 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.8%

Refractive Index

1.463
—

Light Transmission

92%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

117 µm/m·K65 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

150°C302 °F
158°C316 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
104°C219 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

17%
15%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Vicat Softening Point (B50) 160°C320 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

27 kV/mm686 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.12
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

7×10⁻⁵
0.005

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
88 / 100

Weldability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
40 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

26 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

285°C545 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 2%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

30 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.8 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

192 kJ/m³
686 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePMPPOM

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPMPPOM
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PMP vs POM — frequently asked

Is POM stronger than PMP?

Yes. POM has a typical yield strength of 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for PMP — about 158% more. Tensile strength is 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PMP or POM?

POM is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PMP is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PMP or POM?

POM. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against good (65/100) for PMP; for welding the order is POM first (good, 55/100) then PMP (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PMP and POM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.