FabDigitFabDigit

PLLA GF30 vs PLLA TALC20

Polymer · PLLA grade comparison

PLLA GF30 and PLLA TALC20 are two grades of the same polymer grade, PLLA: GF30 (30% glass-fiber reinforced PLLA) versus TALC20 (20% talc / mineral-filled PLLA). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. PLLA GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 47 MPa (6.82 ksi) for PLLA TALC20, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). In exchange, PLLA TALC20 is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 2% for PLLA GF30. PLLA TALC20 is lighter (1.38 g/cm³ vs 1.45 g/cm³ for PLLA GF30) and PLLA GF30 is stiffer (9 GPa vs 4.8 GPa). On the shop floor, PLLA TALC20 machines more easily (good vs fair) and PLLA GF30 welds better (very good vs good).

PLLA GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PLLA TALC20Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PLLA GF30 vs PLLA TALC20: properties

PLLA GF30PLLA TALC20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
4.8 GPa0.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
47 MPa6.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

92 MPa13.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in
2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

83 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

85 HRR
95 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.3 GPa0.19 Msi · Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.59 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.36 · Compressive Modulus 3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.38 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Light Transmission

88%
5%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 175°C347 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 61°C142 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1% · Refractive Index 1.46

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

30 µm/m·K16.7 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

110°C230 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

155°C311 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

120°C248 °F
58°C136 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

60°C140 °F
61°C142 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
22%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 80°C176 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 18 kV/mm457 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.015 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 55 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
18 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.25%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
10 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 205°C401 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.3 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLA

PLLA GF30 vs PLLA TALC20 — frequently asked

Is PLLA GF30 stronger than PLLA TALC20?

Yes. PLLA GF30 has a typical yield strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 47 MPa (6.82 ksi) for PLLA TALC20 — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, GF30 or TALC20?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, PLLA GF30 or PLLA TALC20?

PLLA TALC20. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for PLLA GF30; for welding the order is PLLA GF30 first (very good, 75/100) then PLLA TALC20 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PLLA GF30 and PLLA TALC20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.