FabDigitFabDigit

PLLA FR vs PLLA GF30

Polymer · PLLA grade comparison

PLLA FR and PLLA GF30 are two grades of the same polymer grade, PLLA: FR (flame-retardant PLLA) versus GF30 (30% glass-fiber reinforced PLLA). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. PLLA GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PLLA FR, about 36% more; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi). In exchange, PLLA FR is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 2% for PLLA GF30. PLLA FR is lighter (1.35 g/cm³ vs 1.45 g/cm³ for PLLA GF30) and PLLA GF30 is stiffer (9 GPa vs 3.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PLLA FR machines more easily (good vs fair) and PLLA GF30 welds better (very good vs good).

PLLA FRChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PLLA GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PLLA FR vs PLLA GF30: properties

PLLA FRPLLA GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
9 GPa1.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

44 MPa6.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
2%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
8.5 GPa1.2 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

18 J/m0.34 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

88 HRR
85 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.3 GPa0.19 Msi · Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.59 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.36 · Compressive Modulus 3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 175°C347 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 61°C142 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1% · Refractive Index 1.46 · Light Transmission 88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
30 µm/m·K16.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

62°C144 °F
155°C311 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

53°C127 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

58°C136 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

30%
20%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 80°C176 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 18 kV/mm457 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.015 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

62 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

22 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.8%
0.25%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 205°C401 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.3 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePLLA

PLLA FR vs PLLA GF30 — frequently asked

Is PLLA GF30 stronger than PLLA FR?

Yes. PLLA GF30 has a typical yield strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PLLA FR — about 36% more. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 45 MPa (6.53 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, FR or GF30?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, PLLA FR or PLLA GF30?

PLLA FR. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (45/100) for PLLA GF30; for welding the order is PLLA GF30 first (very good, 75/100) then PLLA FR (good, 62/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PLLA FR and PLLA GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.