FabDigitFabDigit

PI vs PPSU

Polymer · grade comparison

PI and PPSU are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PI is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU, about 23% more. In exchange, PPSU is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 7.5% for PI. PPSU is lighter (1.29 g/cm³ vs 1.43 g/cm³ for PI) and PI is stiffer (3 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, PPSU welds better (very good vs not recommended).

PIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PPSUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PI vs PPSU: properties

PIPPSU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.3 GPa0.34 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.8 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.41
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

86 MPa12.5 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

7.5%
80%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
96 MPa13.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
91 MPa13.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

43 J/m0.81 ft·lbf/in
640 J/m12 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

105 HRM
86 HRM

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
122 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.43 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.29 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

385°C725 °F
220°C428 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.37%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
1.1%

Refractive Index

1.7
1.67

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,130 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,170 J/kg·K0.28 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F
55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

400°C752 °F
214°C417 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

360°C680 °F
207°C405 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
38%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

480°C896 °F
220°C428 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
220°C428 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.45

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0034
0.0076

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
9×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
150 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

60 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
150°C302 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePIPPSU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPIPPSU
Default conditionUnfilledMedical Grade
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PI vs PPSU — frequently asked

Is PI stronger than PPSU?

Yes. PI has a typical tensile strength of 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for PPSU — about 23% more.

Which is cheaper, PI or PPSU?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PI or PPSU?

PPSU. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against not recommended (5/100) for PI.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PI and PPSU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.