FabDigitFabDigit

PI vs PPS

Polymer · grade comparison

PI and PPS are both polymer grades, both high performance plastic. PI is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PPS, about 10% more. PI is the more ductile: elongation 7.5% versus 5% for PPS. PPS is lighter (1.35 g/cm³ vs 1.43 g/cm³ for PI) and PPS is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 3 GPa). On the shop floor, PPS welds better (poor vs not recommended).

PIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PPSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

PI vs PPS: properties

PIPPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.8 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.41
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

86 MPa12.5 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

7.5%
5%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Flexural Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
3.9 GPa0.57 Msi

Shear Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

43 J/m0.81 ft·lbf/in
25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

105 HRM
95 HRM

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
123 HRR

Same in both: Hardness, Shore D 88 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.43 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

385°C725 °F
88°C190 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.03%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
0.1%

Refractive Index

1.7
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
280°C536 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,130 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
220°C428 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

400°C752 °F
240°C464 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

360°C680 °F
110°C230 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

480°C896 °F
260°C500 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 52 µm/m·K28.9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
18 kV/mm457 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0034
0.0013

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
175 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

60 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
320°C608 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePIPPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPIPPS
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. Both take the same 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PI vs PPS — frequently asked

Is PI stronger than PPS?

Yes. PI has a typical tensile strength of 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) against 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) for PPS — about 10% more.

Which is cheaper, PI or PPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PI or PPS?

PI, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PPS; for welding the order is PPS first (poor, 30/100) then PI (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PI and PPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.