FabDigitFabDigit

JIS A9511 EPS vs Phenolic Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

JIS A9511 EPS and Phenolic Foam are both polymer grades. JIS A9511 EPS is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Phenolic Foam, about 33% more. In exchange, Phenolic Foam is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1.5% for JIS A9511 EPS. JIS A9511 EPS is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 0.05 g/cm³ for Phenolic Foam) and Phenolic Foam is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, JIS A9511 EPS welds better (poor vs not recommended).

JIS A9511 EPSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Phenolic FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

JIS A9511 EPS vs Phenolic Foam: properties

JIS A9511 EPSPhenolic Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.1
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.2 MPa0.03 ksi
0.15 MPa0.02 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

0.18 MPa0.03 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

1.5%
2%

Compressive Strength

0.08 MPa0.01 ksi
0.16 MPa0.02 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0 GPa6.53×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Flexural Strength

0.15 MPa0.02 ksi
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.01 GPa7.98×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

0.1 MPa0.01 ksi
0.12 MPa0.02 ksi

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

4%
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.02 g/cm³7.23×10⁻⁴ lb/in³
0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

100°C212 °F
—

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.5%
3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

4%
8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.02 W/m·K0.01 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-80°C-112 °F
-180°C-292 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

98°C208 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
42%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

85°C185 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.04
1.15

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

2×10⁻⁴
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

15 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

30 / 100
1 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
10 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.45%
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

115°C239 °F
—

Same in both: Machinability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

165 L/kg19.8 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

10 kN·m/kg
3 kN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

1.4 mm²/s
0.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.3 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleJIS A9511 EPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityJIS A9511 EPSPhenolic Foam
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

JIS A9511 EPS vs Phenolic Foam — frequently asked

Is JIS A9511 EPS stronger than Phenolic Foam?

Yes. JIS A9511 EPS has a typical tensile strength of 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Phenolic Foam — about 33% more.

Which is cheaper, JIS A9511 EPS or Phenolic Foam?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, JIS A9511 EPS or Phenolic Foam?

JIS A9511 EPS. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (1/100) for Phenolic Foam.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in JIS A9511 EPS and Phenolic Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.