FabDigitFabDigit

Melamine Foam vs Phenolic Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

Melamine Foam and Phenolic Foam are both polymer grades. Phenolic Foam is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) against 0.12 MPa (0.0174 ksi) for Melamine Foam, about 25% more. In exchange, Melamine Foam is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 2% for Phenolic Foam. Phenolic Foam is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 4×10⁻⁴ GPa) and Melamine Foam runs hotter in service (180°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, Phenolic Foam sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Melamine Foam (high, $$$$).

Melamine FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Phenolic FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Melamine Foam vs Phenolic Foam: properties

Melamine FoamPhenolic Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

4×10⁻⁴ GPa5.8×10⁻⁵ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.12 MPa0.02 ksi
0.15 MPa0.02 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
2%

Compressive Strength

0.01 MPa0 ksi
0.16 MPa0.02 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2×10⁻⁴ GPa2.9×10⁻⁵ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

—
0.12 MPa0.02 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

—
0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.02 W/m·K0.01 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-180°C-292 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

32%
42%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

—
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.05
1.15

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
—

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Corrosion Resistance

—
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
10 / 100

Weldability

—
1 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMelamine FoamPhenolic Foam
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Melamine Foam vs Phenolic Foam — frequently asked

Is Phenolic Foam stronger than Melamine Foam?

Yes. Phenolic Foam has a typical tensile strength of 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) against 0.12 MPa (0.0174 ksi) for Melamine Foam — about 25% more.

Which is cheaper, Melamine Foam or Phenolic Foam?

Phenolic Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Melamine Foam is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Melamine Foam or Phenolic Foam?

Phenolic Foam, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 90/100 against 85/100 for Melamine Foam.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Melamine Foam and Phenolic Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.