FabDigitFabDigit

PETG vs PTMT

Polymer · grade comparison

PETG and PTMT are both polymer grades. PTMT is the stronger of the two: yield strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PETG is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 100% for PTMT. PETG is lighter (1.27 g/cm³ vs 1.31 g/cm³ for PTMT) and PTMT is stiffer (2.6 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, PETG welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100) and PETG sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PTMT (standard, $$).

PETGChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PTMTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PETG vs PTMT: properties

PETGPTMT

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.77 GPa0.11 Msi
0.95 GPa0.14 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

120%
100%

Compressive Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
118 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
70 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
50°C122 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.13%
0.08%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
0.45%

Refractive Index

1.57
1.58

Light Transmission

89%
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
225°C437 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

63°C145 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

64°C147 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

82°C180 °F
178°C352 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

23%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

75°C167 °F
160°C320 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.018

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
1.7%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

245°C473 °F
255°C491 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
70°C158 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
25 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

595 kJ/m³
582 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPTMT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPETGPTMT
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PETG vs PTMT — frequently asked

Is PTMT stronger than PETG?

Yes. PTMT has a typical yield strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PETG or PTMT?

PETG is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PTMT is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PETG or PTMT?

PETG. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (70/100) for PTMT.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PETG and PTMT side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.