FabDigitFabDigit

PET vs PETG

Polymer · grade comparison

PET and PETG are both polymer grades. PET is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG, about 60% more; tensile strength follows at 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PETG is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 20% for PET, and PET is harder (85 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). PETG is lighter (1.27 g/cm³ vs 1.39 g/cm³ for PET) and PET is stiffer (3.1 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, PET machines more easily (very good vs good), PETG welds better (very good vs fair), and PETG sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PET (standard, $$).

PETChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PETGChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PET vs PETG: properties

PETPETG

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.77 GPa0.11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.65 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

82 MPa11.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
120%

Compressive Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

94 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
115 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.39 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

255°C491 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

79°C174 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.11%
0.13%

Refractive Index

1.575
1.57

Light Transmission

88%
89%

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
63°C145 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

115°C239 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

80°C176 °F
64°C147 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

180°C356 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

150°C302 °F
75°C167 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
2.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.018
0.02

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
0.35%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

280°C536 °F
245°C473 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

135°C275 °F
25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,032 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPET

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPETPETG
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PET vs PETG — frequently asked

Is PET stronger than PETG?

Yes. PET has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG — about 60% more. Tensile strength is 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PET or PETG?

PETG is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PET is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PET or PETG?

PET. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against good (65/100) for PETG; for welding the order is PETG first (very good, 80/100) then PET (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PET and PETG side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.