FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK Annealed vs PEEK CF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK Annealed and PEEK-CF30 are both polymer grades, compared here in the Annealed condition. PEEK-CF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for PEEK Annealed, about 147% more. In exchange, PEEK Annealed is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 1.7% for PEEK-CF30. PEEK Annealed is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.41 g/cm³ for PEEK-CF30) and PEEK-CF30 is stiffer (24 GPa vs 3.9 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK Annealed machines more easily (very good vs good), PEEK Annealed welds better (45 vs 35 out of 100), and PEEK-CF30 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PEEK Annealed (specialty, $$$$$).

PEEK AnnealedChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEEK-CF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PEEK Annealed vs PEEK-CF30: properties

PEEK AnnealedPEEK-CF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.9 GPa0.57 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

12%
1.7%

Compressive Strength

135 MPa19.6 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
16 GPa2.3 Msi

Flexural Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.2 GPa0.61 Msi
20 GPa2.9 Msi

Shear Strength

57 MPa8.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.2 MPa·√m2.9 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

87 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
105 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.08%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.3%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 143°C289 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.26 W/m·K0.15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.9 W/m·K0.52 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
260°C500 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

320°C608 °F
340°C644 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

155°C311 °F
315°C599 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

316°C601 °F
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
310°C590 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 35%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
100 Ω·m3.94×10⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.003
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
10,000 Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
100,000 Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

150 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

91 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.3%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
385°C725 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Melt Flow Rate 3 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

15 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK AnnealedPEEK-CF30
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionVirgin—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PEEK Annealed vs PEEK-CF30 — frequently asked

Is PEEK-CF30 stronger than PEEK Annealed?

Yes. PEEK-CF30 has a typical tensile strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for PEEK Annealed — about 147% more.

Which is cheaper, PEEK Annealed or PEEK-CF30?

PEEK-CF30 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PEEK Annealed is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK Annealed or PEEK-CF30?

PEEK Annealed. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for PEEK-CF30; for welding the order is PEEK Annealed first (fair, 45/100) then PEEK-CF30 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK Annealed and PEEK-CF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.