FabDigitFabDigit

PC/PET vs PC-Si

Polymer · grade comparison

PC/PET and PC-Si are both polymer grades. PC-Si is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 53 MPa (7.69 ksi) for PC/PET, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). PC-Si runs hotter in service (115°C vs 100°C continuous).

PC-SiChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PC/PET vs PC-Si: properties

PC/PETPC-Si

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

53 MPa7.7 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Compressive Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

82 MPa11.9 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

700 J/m13.1 ft·lbf/in
850 J/m15.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

72 HRM
68 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.49 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

—
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Hardness, Shore D

—
80 Shore D

Same in both: Elongation at Break 120% · Flexural Modulus 2.2 GPa0.32 Msi · Hardness, Rockwell R 118 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.22 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

250°C482 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

140°C284 °F
143°C289 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.4%
0.35%

Refractive Index

—
1.585

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.15%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
115°C239 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
132°C270 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

92°C198 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

138°C280 °F
142°C288 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

26%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
145°C293 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.012
0.01

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 250 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Corrosion Resistance

—
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.8%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

18 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

265°C509 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

75°C167 °F
90°C194 °F

Formability (cold)

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100 · Weldability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
112 MJ/kg48,151 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
7.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
50 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

669 kJ/m³
765 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC/PETPC-Si

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC/PETPC-Si
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PC/PET vs PC-Si — frequently asked

Is PC-Si stronger than PC/PET?

Yes. PC-Si has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 53 MPa (7.69 ksi) for PC/PET — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC/PET or PC-Si?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose PC/PET over PC-Si?

Pick PC-Si when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC/PET and PC-Si side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.