FabDigitFabDigit

PC-GF vs PC-Si

Polymer · grade comparison

PC-GF and PC-Si are both polymer grades. PC-GF is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PC-Si, about 117% more. In exchange, PC-Si is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 2.5% for PC-GF. PC-Si is lighter (1.19 g/cm³ vs 1.43 g/cm³ for PC-GF) and PC-GF is stiffer (8.5 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, PC-Si welds better (very good vs good) and PC-GF sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PC-Si (premium, $$$).

PC-GFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PC-SiChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PC-GF vs PC-Si: properties

PC-GFPC-Si

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
0.8 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

10 GPa1.4 Msi
3 GPa0.49 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
120%

Compressive Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

7 GPa1 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Flexural Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

8 GPa1.2 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

110 J/m2.1 ft·lbf/in
850 J/m15.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

93 HRM
68 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

119 HRR
118 HRR

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Hardness, Shore D

—
80 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.43 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

147°C297 °F
143°C289 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.3%
0.35%

Refractive Index

—
1.585

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
115°C239 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

152°C306 °F
132°C270 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

146°C295 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

152°C306 °F
142°C288 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

27%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

160°C320 °F
145°C293 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.01

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

175 V
250 V

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
75 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
80 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

300°C572 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

100°C212 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
112 MJ/kg48,151 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
7.8 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

91 kN·m/kg
50 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.9 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePC-Si

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPC-GFPC-Si
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PC-GF vs PC-Si — frequently asked

Is PC-GF stronger than PC-Si?

Yes. PC-GF has a typical tensile strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PC-Si — about 117% more.

Which is cheaper, PC-GF or PC-Si?

PC-GF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PC-Si is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PC-GF or PC-Si?

PC-Si. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for PC-GF.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC-GF and PC-Si side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.