FabDigitFabDigit

PC vs PETG-CF

Polymer · grade comparison

PC and PETG-CF are both polymer grades, both multipurpose plastic. PC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG-CF, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi). PC is the more ductile: elongation 110% versus 4.5% for PETG-CF. PC is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.32 g/cm³ for PETG-CF) and PETG-CF is stiffer (4.2 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PC welds better (very good vs fair) and PC sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PETG-CF (standard, $$).

PCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PC vs PETG-CF: properties

PCPETG-CF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.34 Msi
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.83 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

68 MPa9.9 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

63 MPa9.1 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

110%
4.5%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Flexural Strength

97 MPa14.1 ksi
82 MPa11.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.4 GPa0.34 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Shear Strength

41 MPa5.9 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

84 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

70 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
112 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.32 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

147°C297 °F
79°C174 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.14%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
0.5%

Refractive Index

1.585
—

Light Transmission

88%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

67 µm/m·K37.2 µin/in·°F
40 µm/m·K22.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
68°C154 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

138°C280 °F
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

129°C264 °F
70°C158 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

146°C295 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

26%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

145°C293 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
—

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.01
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
12 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

295°C563 °F
250°C482 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
78°C172 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.3 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
3.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

844 kJ/m³
298 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETG-CFPC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCPETG-CF
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Spray PaintingYes—

Both are offered for 3D printing. They share 10 finishes: Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

PC vs PETG-CF — frequently asked

Is PC stronger than PETG-CF?

Yes. PC has a typical yield strength of 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for PETG-CF — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC or PETG-CF?

PC is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PETG-CF is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PC or PETG-CF?

PC. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against fair (45/100) for PETG-CF.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC and PETG-CF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.