FabDigitFabDigit

PBT GF30 vs PBT PTFE-LUB

Polymer · grade comparison

PBT-GF30 and PBT PTFE-LUB are both polymer grades, compared here in the PTFE-LUB condition. PBT-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PBT PTFE-LUB, about 171% more. In exchange, PBT PTFE-LUB is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 3% for PBT-GF30, and PBT-GF30 is harder (85 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). PBT PTFE-LUB is lighter (1.42 g/cm³ vs 1.53 g/cm³ for PBT-GF30) and PBT-GF30 is stiffer (10 GPa vs 2.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PBT PTFE-LUB machines more easily (very good vs good) and PBT-GF30 welds better (45 vs 35 out of 100).

PBT-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PBT PTFE-LUBChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PBT-GF30 vs PBT PTFE-LUB: properties

PBT-GF30PBT PTFE-LUB

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

10 GPa1.5 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
0.93 GPa0.13 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
20%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
2.3 MPa·√m2.1 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
35 J/m0.66 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

90 HRM
70 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
112 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
48 MPa7 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.53 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.06%
0.09%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
0.45%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 225°C437 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.27 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

215°C419 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

207°C405 °F
58°C136 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

190°C374 °F
160°C320 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
23 kV/mm584 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.7
3.1

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

550 V
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
84 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
72 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
28 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.7%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

260°C500 °F
250°C482 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

80°C176 °F
70°C158 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.4 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePBT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBT-GF30PBT PTFE-LUB
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PBT-GF30 vs PBT PTFE-LUB — frequently asked

Is PBT-GF30 stronger than PBT PTFE-LUB?

Yes. PBT-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PBT PTFE-LUB — about 171% more.

Which is cheaper, PBT-GF30 or PBT PTFE-LUB?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PBT-GF30 or PBT PTFE-LUB?

PBT PTFE-LUB. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (55/100) for PBT-GF30; for welding the order is PBT-GF30 first (fair, 45/100) then PBT PTFE-LUB (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBT-GF30 and PBT PTFE-LUB side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.