FabDigitFabDigit

PBT GF30 vs PBT HS

Polymer · grade comparison

PBT-GF30 and PBT HS are both polymer grades, compared here in the HS condition. PBT-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for PBT HS, about 136% more. In exchange, PBT HS is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 3% for PBT-GF30. PBT HS is lighter (1.31 g/cm³ vs 1.53 g/cm³ for PBT-GF30) and PBT-GF30 is stiffer (10 GPa vs 2.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PBT HS machines more easily (very good vs good) and PBT HS welds better (good vs fair).

PBT-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design.

PBT HSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PBT-GF30 vs PBT HS: properties

PBT-GF30PBT HS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

10 GPa1.5 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
0.93 GPa0.13 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
80%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

8.5 GPa1.2 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

90 HRM
75 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
118 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.53 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
55°C131 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.06%
0.09%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
0.45%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 225°C437 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

215°C419 °F
155°C311 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

207°C405 °F
62°C144 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

200°C392 °F
178°C352 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

190°C374 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
23 kV/mm584 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.7
3.1

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

550 V
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
1.8%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

260°C500 °F
250°C482 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

80°C176 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Melt Flow Rate 20 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.4 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePBT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPBT-GF30PBT HS
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PBT-GF30 vs PBT HS — frequently asked

Is PBT-GF30 stronger than PBT HS?

Yes. PBT-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for PBT HS — about 136% more.

Which is cheaper, PBT-GF30 or PBT HS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PBT-GF30 or PBT HS?

PBT HS. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for PBT-GF30; for welding the order is PBT HS first (good, 60/100) then PBT-GF30 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PBT-GF30 and PBT HS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.