FabDigitFabDigit

PA66 vs PA6T

Polymer · grade comparison

PA66 and PA6T are both polymer grades. PA6T is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for PA66, about 19% more; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 82 MPa (11.9 ksi). In exchange, PA66 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 20% for PA6T, and PA6T is harder (86 Shore D vs 81 Shore D). PA66 is lighter (1.14 g/cm³ vs 1.19 g/cm³ for PA6T) and PA6T is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 3 GPa). On the shop floor, PA66 welds better (very good vs good) and PA66 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PA6T (premium, $$$).

PA66Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA6TChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PA66 vs PA6T: properties

PA66PA6T

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.65 Msi
5 GPa0.77 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

82 MPa11.9 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
20%

Compressive Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Shore D

81 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

85 HRM
95 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
122 HRR

Same in both: Izod Impact, Notched 50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

262°C504 °F
315°C599 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

70°C158 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.3%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

8.5%
4%

Refractive Index

1.53
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,670 J/kg·K0.4 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

220°C428 °F
250°C482 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

80°C176 °F
115°C239 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

200°C392 °F
265°C509 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

170°C338 °F
210°C410 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.018

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
76 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
1.4%

Melt Flow Rate

30 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
330°C626 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

80°C176 °F
140°C284 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.7 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

72 kN·m/kg
84 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,067 kJ/m³
1,410 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA66PA6T

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA66PA6T
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PA66 vs PA6T — frequently asked

Is PA6T stronger than PA66?

Yes. PA6T has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for PA66 — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 82 MPa (11.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA66 or PA6T?

PA66 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PA6T is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PA66 or PA6T?

PA66, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PA6T; for welding the order is PA66 first (very good, 70/100) then PA6T (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA66 and PA6T side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.