FabDigitFabDigit

PA612 vs PA66

Polymer · grade comparison

PA612 and PA66 are both polymer grades. PA66 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PA612, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi). In exchange, PA612 is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 40% for PA66. PA612 is lighter (1.07 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA66) and PA66 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, PA66 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PA612 (premium, $$$).

PA612Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA66Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PA612 vs PA66: properties

PA612PA66

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.78 GPa0.11 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
82 MPa11.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

120%
40%

Compressive Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Flexural Strength

78 MPa11.3 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Shear Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

79 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

78 HRM
85 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
120 HRR

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.07 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

218°C424 °F
262°C504 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

48°C118 °F
70°C158 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.7%
8.5%

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,670 J/kg·K0.4 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

160°C320 °F
220°C428 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

185°C365 °F
200°C392 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
25%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

160°C320 °F
170°C338 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
3.4

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.3%
1.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

260°C500 °F
290°C554 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
30 g/10 min

Same in both: Weldability 70 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 80°C176 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

801 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA66PA612

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA612PA66
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PA612 vs PA66 — frequently asked

Is PA66 stronger than PA612?

Yes. PA66 has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for PA612 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA612 or PA66?

PA66 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PA612 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PA612 or PA66?

PA612. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for PA66.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA612 and PA66 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.