FabDigitFabDigit

PA12 vs PA46

Polymer · grade comparison

PA12 and PA46 are both polymer grades. PA46 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA12, about 138% more; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). PA46 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 18% for PA12, and PA46 is harder (83 Shore D vs 77 Shore D). PA12 is lighter (1.01 g/cm³ vs 1.18 g/cm³ for PA46) and PA46 is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 1.7 GPa). On the shop floor, PA46 welds better (very good vs good) and PA12 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PA46 (high, $$$$).

PA12Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PA46Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PA12 vs PA46: properties

PA12PA46

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.7 GPa0.25 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
40%

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

77 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

106 HRR
120 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
88 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.01 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

180°C356 °F
295°C563 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

45°C113 °F
78°C172 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.5%
12.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

105 µm/m·K58.3 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

165°C329 °F
275°C527 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

90°C194 °F
160°C320 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
290°C554 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

22%
25%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
230°C446 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.7%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
315°C599 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
100°C212 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

138 MJ/kg59,329 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.6 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

48 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

471 kJ/m³
1,367 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA12PA46

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA12PA46
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PA12 vs PA46 — frequently asked

Is PA46 stronger than PA12?

Yes. PA46 has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA12 — about 138% more. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA12 or PA46?

PA12 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PA46 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PA12 or PA46?

PA46, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PA12; for welding the order is PA46 first (very good, 70/100) then PA12 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA12 and PA46 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.