FabDigitFabDigit

PA1010 vs PA66

Polymer · grade comparison

PA1010 and PA66 are both polymer grades. PA66 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PA1010, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi). In exchange, PA1010 is the more ductile: elongation 180% versus 40% for PA66. PA1010 is lighter (1.05 g/cm³ vs 1.14 g/cm³ for PA66) and PA66 is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PA66 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PA1010 (premium, $$$).

PA1010Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA66Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PA1010 vs PA66: properties

PA1010PA66

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
82 MPa11.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

180%
40%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

110 HRR
120 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
85 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.14 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

205°C401 °F
262°C504 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

45°C113 °F
70°C158 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
1.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
8.5%

Refractive Index

—
1.53

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,670 J/kg·K0.4 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

145°C293 °F
220°C428 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

52°C126 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

178°C352 °F
200°C392 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
25%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
170°C338 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.025
0.02

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 22 kV/mm559 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.4 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
50 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
30 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 1.5%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.7 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

50 kN·m/kg
72 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.4 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

768 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA66PA1010

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA1010PA66
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PA1010 vs PA66 — frequently asked

Is PA66 stronger than PA1010?

Yes. PA66 has a typical yield strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PA1010 — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 82 MPa (11.9 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA1010 or PA66?

PA66 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PA1010 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PA1010 or PA66?

PA1010. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (65/100) for PA66; for welding the order is PA1010 first (very good, 75/100) then PA66 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA1010 and PA66 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.