FabDigitFabDigit

MPR vs TPU-Ester

Polymer · grade comparison

MPR and TPU-Ester are both polymer grades. TPU-Ester is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.23 ksi) for MPR, about 5.3 times as much. TPU-Ester is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 300% for MPR, and TPU-Ester is harder (40 Shore D vs 24 Shore D). TPU-Ester is stiffer (0.05 GPa vs 0.01 GPa) and MPR runs hotter in service (120°C vs 80°C continuous). On the shop floor, TPU-Ester welds better (excellent vs very good) and TPU-Ester sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than MPR (premium, $$$).

MPRChoose it when the part sees heat.

TPU-EsterChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

MPR vs TPU-Ester: properties

MPRTPU-Ester

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0.05 GPa0.01 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.48
0.49

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

9 MPa1.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

300%
500%

Flexural Modulus

0.02 GPa0 Msi
0.05 GPa0.01 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

70 Shore A
90 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

24 Shore D
40 Shore D

Tear Strength

30 kN/m171 lbf/in
100 kN/m571 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

30%
35%

Shear Modulus

—
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.22 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-25°C-13 °F
-35°C-31 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.6%
0.7%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
210°C410 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
1.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.52

Light Transmission

—
80%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

190 µm/m·K106 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-35°C-31 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

30%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

145°C293 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

6.5
5

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.05

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹² Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
75 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

80 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
80 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
0.8%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
210°C410 °F

Polishability

—
50 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
25 g/10 min

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

10%
2%

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

7 kN·m/kg
37 kN·m/kg

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMPRTPU-Ester
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

MPR vs TPU-Ester — frequently asked

Is TPU-Ester stronger than MPR?

Yes. TPU-Ester has a typical tensile strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.23 ksi) for MPR — about 5.3 times as much.

Which is cheaper, MPR or TPU-Ester?

TPU-Ester is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while MPR is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, MPR or TPU-Ester?

TPU-Ester. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for MPR; for welding the order is TPU-Ester first (excellent, 85/100) then MPR (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MPR and TPU-Ester side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.