FabDigitFabDigit

LDPE vs mPPE

Polymer · grade comparison

LDPE and mPPE are both polymer grades. mPPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for LDPE, about 5.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) vs 11 MPa (1.6 ksi). In exchange, LDPE is the more ductile: elongation 450% versus 50% for mPPE. LDPE is lighter (0.92 g/cm³ vs 1.08 g/cm³ for mPPE) and mPPE is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.22 GPa). On the shop floor, mPPE machines more easily (good vs fair), LDPE welds better (excellent vs good), and LDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than mPPE (premium, $$$).

LDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

mPPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

LDPE vs mPPE: properties

LDPEmPPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.08 GPa0.01 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.26 Msi
3 GPa0.49 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

11 MPa1.6 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

450%
50%

Compressive Strength

9 MPa1.3 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.2 GPa0.03 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

8 MPa1.2 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.4 MPa·√m1.3 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in
210 J/m3.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

93 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

47 Shore D
—

Tear Strength

55 kN/m314 lbf/in
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
78 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
119 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

110°C230 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
145°C293 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.07%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.02%
0.6%

Refractive Index

1.51
—

Light Transmission

80%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

190 µm/m·K106 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

47°C117 °F
138°C280 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

34°C93 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

50°C122 °F
140°C284 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
25%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
130°C266 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.28
2.65

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
0.0012

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
400 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

20 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

2 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
280°C536 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
90°C194 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

12 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
2.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

227 kJ/m³
701 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleLDPEmPPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityLDPEmPPE
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

LDPE vs mPPE — frequently asked

Is mPPE stronger than LDPE?

Yes. mPPE has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for LDPE — about 5.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) vs 11 MPa (1.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, LDPE or mPPE?

LDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while mPPE is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, LDPE or mPPE?

mPPE. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (45/100) for LDPE; for welding the order is LDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then mPPE (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in LDPE and mPPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.