FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs mPPE

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and mPPE are both polymer grades. mPPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). mPPE is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 25% for ABS. ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.08 g/cm³ for mPPE) and mPPE runs hotter in service (100°C vs 75°C continuous). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good), ABS welds better (very good vs good), and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than mPPE (premium, $$$).

ABSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

mPPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ABS vs mPPE: properties

ABSmPPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
3 GPa0.49 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
50%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
210 J/m3.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
119 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
78 HRM

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.08 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
145°C293 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.07%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
138°C280 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
140°C284 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
25%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
130°C266 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.65

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.0012

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
400 V

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
280°C536 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
701 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 2.2 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSmPPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSmPPE
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs mPPE — frequently asked

Is mPPE stronger than ABS?

Yes. mPPE has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or mPPE?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while mPPE is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or mPPE?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (65/100) for mPPE; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then mPPE (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and mPPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.