FabDigitFabDigit

Extem XH1015 vs Torlon 7130

Polymer · grade comparison

Extem XH1015 and Torlon 7130 are both polymer grades. Torlon 7130 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 203 MPa (29.4 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for Extem XH1015, about 77% more. In exchange, Extem XH1015 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 6% for Torlon 7130. Extem XH1015 is lighter (1.31 g/cm³ vs 1.48 g/cm³ for Torlon 7130) and Torlon 7130 is stiffer (22.4 GPa vs 3.6 GPa). On the shop floor, Extem XH1015 machines more easily (good vs fair) and Extem XH1015 welds better (fair vs not recommended).

Extem XH1015Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Torlon 7130Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Extem XH1015 vs Torlon 7130: properties

Extem XH1015Torlon 7130

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
22.4 GPa3.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
203 MPa29.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

30%
6%

Compressive Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
15 GPa2.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.4 GPa0.49 Msi
17.2 GPa2.5 Msi

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.8 MPa·√m2.5 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
90 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

112 HRM
120 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Izod Impact, Notched 45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.31 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.48 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

267°C513 °F
275°C527 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.24%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.4%
2.6%

Refractive Index

1.67
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.53 W/m·K0.31 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

230°C446 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

262°C504 °F
285°C545 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

247°C477 °F
279°C534 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

265°C509 °F
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
280°C536 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 50%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
100 Ω·m3.94×10⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
10,000 Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

175 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.1%

Melt Flow Rate

15 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
215°C419 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
15 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

88 kN·m/kg
137 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.7 MN·m/kg
15.1 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleExtem XH1015

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityExtem XH1015Torlon 7130
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Extem XH1015 vs Torlon 7130 — frequently asked

Is Torlon 7130 stronger than Extem XH1015?

Yes. Torlon 7130 has a typical tensile strength of 203 MPa (29.4 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for Extem XH1015 — about 77% more.

Which is cheaper, Extem XH1015 or Torlon 7130?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Extem XH1015 or Torlon 7130?

Extem XH1015. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for Torlon 7130; for welding the order is Extem XH1015 first (fair, 35/100) then Torlon 7130 (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Extem XH1015 and Torlon 7130 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.