Extem XH1015 vs TP-PI
Polymer · grade comparison
Extem XH1015 and TP-PI are both polymer grades. Extem XH1015 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for TP-PI, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) vs 92 MPa (13.3 ksi). In exchange, TP-PI is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 30% for Extem XH1015. Extem XH1015 is stiffer (3.6 GPa vs 2.9 GPa) and TP-PI conducts heat better (0.29 W/m·K vs 0.22 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Extem XH1015 welds better (fair vs poor).
Extem XH1015Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.
TP-PIChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
Extem XH1015 vs TP-PI: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Compressive Modulus
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Shear Strength
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Izod Impact, Notched
Hardness, Rockwell M
Bulk Modulus
Hardness, Rockwell R
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38 · Hardness, Shore D 88 Shore D
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Glass Transition (Tg)
Water Absorption (24 h)
Water Absorption (Saturation)
Refractive Index
Melting Temperature (Tm)
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa
Vicat Softening Point (B50)
Limiting Oxygen Index
Same in both: Max Service Temperature (short-term) 300°C572 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Resistivity
Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)
Volume Resistivity
Same in both: Dielectric Strength 22 kV/mm559 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.2 · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 175 V
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
UV / Weathering Resistance
Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 88 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Polishability
Mold Shrinkage
Melt Flow Rate
Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)
Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 200°C392 °F
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | Extem XH1015 | TP-PI |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Extem XH1015 vs TP-PI — frequently asked
Is Extem XH1015 stronger than TP-PI?
Yes. Extem XH1015 has a typical yield strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for TP-PI — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) vs 92 MPa (13.3 ksi).
Which is cheaper, Extem XH1015 or TP-PI?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, Extem XH1015 or TP-PI?
TP-PI, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for Extem XH1015; for welding the order is Extem XH1015 first (fair, 35/100) then TP-PI (poor, 25/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Extem XH1015 and TP-PI side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.