FabDigitFabDigit

EPM vs TPU

Polymer · grade comparison

EPM and TPU are both polymer grades. TPU is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 14 MPa (2.03 ksi) for EPM, about 186% more. TPU is the more ductile: elongation 550% versus 320% for EPM. EPM is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.18 g/cm³ for TPU) and TPU is stiffer (0.03 GPa vs 0.01 GPa).

EPMChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

TPUChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPM vs TPU: properties

EPMTPU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa8.7×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

0 GPa2.9×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.49
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

14 MPa2 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

320%
550%

Hardness, Shore A

70 Shore A
85 Shore A

Tear Strength

30 kN/m171 lbf/in
70 kN/m400 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

18%
35%

Hardness, Shore D

—
33 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-55°C-67 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
185°C365 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
1.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,000 J/kg·K0.48 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
22%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

175°C347 °F
120°C248 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
72°C162 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.05

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹² Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

97 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
90 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
1.2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

175°C347 °F
30°C86 °F

Weldability

—
85 / 100

Polishability

—
40 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
210°C410 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

12 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
2

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTPU

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEPMTPU
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Shore A 85
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

EPM vs TPU — frequently asked

Is TPU stronger than EPM?

Yes. TPU has a typical tensile strength of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 14 MPa (2.03 ksi) for EPM — about 186% more.

Which is cheaper, EPM or TPU?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, EPM or TPU?

EPM, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for TPU.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EPM and TPU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.