FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC vs PVC-U

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC and PVC-U are both polymer grades. CPVC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PVC-U, about 6% more. PVC-U is lighter (1.42 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for CPVC) and CPVC runs hotter in service (93°C vs 60°C continuous). On the shop floor, PVC-U welds better (excellent vs good).

CPVCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PVC-UChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

CPVC vs PVC-U: properties

CPVCPVC-U

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
38 MPa5.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
60 J/m1.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
115 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.4 MPa·√m2.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
70 HRM

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 3 GPa0.44 Msi · Shear Modulus 1.1 GPa0.16 Msi · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 52 MPa7.5 ksi · Elongation at Break 25% · Hardness, Shore D 82 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.25%
0.2%

Refractive Index

1.55
1.54

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
60°C140 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
72°C162 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

103°C217 °F
66°C151 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
78°C172 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
45%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
75°C167 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3.2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
0.02

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

65 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
185°C365 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
8%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
37 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Modulus of Resilience 451 kJ/m³ · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC-UCPVC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVCPVC-U
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

CPVC vs PVC-U — frequently asked

Is CPVC stronger than PVC-U?

Yes. CPVC has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PVC-U — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, CPVC or PVC-U?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CPVC or PVC-U?

PVC-U, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 75/100 for CPVC; for welding the order is PVC-U first (excellent, 90/100) then CPVC (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC and PVC-U side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.