FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs SEBS

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and SEBS are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for SEBS, about 43% more. In exchange, SEBS is the more ductile: elongation 550% versus 25% for ABS, and ABS is harder (78 Shore D vs 24 Shore D). SEBS is lighter (0.91 g/cm³ vs 1.04 g/cm³ for ABS) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 0.02 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs poor), ABS welds better (very good vs good), and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than SEBS (standard, $$).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

SEBSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ABS vs SEBS: properties

ABSSEBS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

25%
550%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
—

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
24 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
72 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
45 kN/m257 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.91 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.15%

Refractive Index

—
1.505

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.18 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
85°C185 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
75°C167 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
5×10⁻⁴

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
210°C410 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
2

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSSEBS
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs SEBS — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than SEBS?

Yes. ABS has a typical tensile strength of 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for SEBS — about 43% more.

Which is cheaper, ABS or SEBS?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while SEBS is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or SEBS?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (25/100) for SEBS; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then SEBS (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and SEBS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.