FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel 205 vs Nitinol

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel 205 and Nitinol are both nickel alloy grades. Nitinol is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for Nickel 205, about 176% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi). In exchange, Nickel 205 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 30% for Nitinol, and Nitinol is harder (250 HV vs 100 HV). Nitinol is lighter (6.45 g/cm³ vs 8.89 g/cm³ for Nickel 205) and Nickel 205 is stiffer (207 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, Nickel 205 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended), Nickel 205 welds better (very good vs fair), and Nitinol sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nickel 205 (high, $$$$).

Nickel 205Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

NitinolChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Nickel 205 vs Nitinol: properties

Nickel 205Nitinol

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

440 MPa63.8 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

145 MPa21 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
30%

Reduction in Area

70%
—

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

50 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
250 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
6.45 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,435°C2,615 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,446°C2,635 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

70 W/m·K40.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

456 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.3 µm/m·K7.4 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

297 J/g128 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

19 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.58 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
82 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
10%

Weldability

80 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

165 MJ/kg70,937 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
147 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
11.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

51 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.3 mm²/s
5.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNitinolNickel 205

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityNickel 205Nitinol
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—1.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Nickel 205 vs Nitinol — frequently asked

Is Nitinol stronger than Nickel 205?

Yes. Nitinol has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for Nickel 205 — about 176% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Nickel 205 or Nitinol?

Nitinol is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nickel 205 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Nickel 205 or Nitinol?

Nickel 205. Its machinability rates poor (32/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Nitinol; for welding the order is Nickel 205 first (very good, 80/100) then Nitinol (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Nickel 205 and Nitinol side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.