FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Monel 401 vs Nitinol

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Monel 401 and Nitinol are both nickel alloy grades. Nitinol is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Monel 401, about 135% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi). In exchange, Monel 401 is the more ductile: elongation 42% versus 30% for Nitinol, and Nitinol is harder (250 HV vs 120 HV). Nitinol is lighter (6.45 g/cm³ vs 8.86 g/cm³ for Monel 401) and Monel 401 is stiffer (160 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, Monel 401 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended), Monel 401 welds better (good vs fair), and Nitinol sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Monel 401 (high, $$$$).

Monel 401Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

NitinolChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Monel 401 vs Nitinol: properties

Monel 401Nitinol

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

61 GPa8.8 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

133 GPa19.3 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

42%
30%

Reduction in Area

65%
—

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

180 J133 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

115 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

120 HV
250 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
6.45 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,260°C2,300 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

410 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.2 µm/m·K7.9 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.85×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.1 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.18 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

27%
10%

Weldability

65 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

53 kN·m/kg
147 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18.1 MN·m/kg
11.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

90 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.8 mm²/s
5.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNitinolMonel 401

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMonel 401Nitinol
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—1.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Monel 401 vs Nitinol — frequently asked

Is Nitinol stronger than Monel 401?

Yes. Nitinol has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Monel 401 — about 135% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Monel 401 or Nitinol?

Nitinol is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Monel 401 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Monel 401 or Nitinol?

Monel 401. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Nitinol; for welding the order is Monel 401 first (good, 65/100) then Nitinol (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Monel 401 and Nitinol side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.