FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy 2.4889 vs Nitinol

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy 2.4889 and Nitinol are both nickel alloy grades. Nitinol is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 760 MPa (110 ksi) for 2.4889, about 25% more. Nitinol is harder — 250 HV against 180 HV for 2.4889 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Nitinol is lighter (6.45 g/cm³ vs 8.12 g/cm³ for 2.4889) and 2.4889 is stiffer (216 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, 2.4889 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended), 2.4889 welds better (good vs fair), and 2.4889 forms better (very good vs fair).

2.4889Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

NitinolChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

2.4889 vs Nitinol: properties

2.4889Nitinol

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

216 GPa31.3 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Reduction in Area

60%
—

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

170 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
250 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Same in both: Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 400 MPa58 ksi · Elongation at Break 30%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.12 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
6.45 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,380°C2,516 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.5 µm/m·K7.5 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,250°C2,282 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.5 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.18×10⁻⁶ Ω·m46.5 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
10%

Weldability

65 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

160 MJ/kg68,788 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

94 kN·m/kg
147 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.6 MN·m/kg
11.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

370 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.7 mm²/s
5.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNitinol2.4889

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2.4889Nitinol
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—1.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

2.4889 vs Nitinol — frequently asked

Is Nitinol stronger than 2.4889?

Yes. Nitinol has a typical tensile strength of 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 760 MPa (110 ksi) for 2.4889 — about 25% more.

Which is cheaper, 2.4889 or Nitinol?

Nitinol is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 2.4889 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 2.4889 or Nitinol?

2.4889. Its machinability rates poor (22/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Nitinol; for welding the order is 2.4889 first (good, 65/100) then Nitinol (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2.4889 and Nitinol side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.