FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel 270 vs Nitinol

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel 270 and Nitinol are both nickel alloy grades. Nitinol is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for Nickel 270, about 3.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 345 MPa (50 ksi). In exchange, Nickel 270 is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 30% for Nitinol, and Nitinol is harder (250 HV vs 50 HV). Nitinol is lighter (6.45 g/cm³ vs 8.89 g/cm³ for Nickel 270) and Nickel 270 is stiffer (207 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, Nickel 270 welds better (excellent vs fair) and Nitinol sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nickel 270 (high, $$$$).

Nickel 270Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

NitinolChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Nickel 270 vs Nitinol: properties

Nickel 270Nitinol

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

345 MPa50 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

50%
30%

Reduction in Area

75%
—

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
—

Hardness, Vickers

50 HV
250 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
6.45 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,454°C2,649 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,455°C2,651 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

85 W/m·K49.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

456 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.3 µm/m·K7.4 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

297 J/g128 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

23 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
10%

Weldability

85 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

82 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
147 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
11.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

27 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21 mm²/s
5.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNitinolNickel 270

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityNickel 270Nitinol
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—1.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Nickel 270 vs Nitinol — frequently asked

Is Nitinol stronger than Nickel 270?

Yes. Nitinol has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for Nickel 270 — about 3.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 345 MPa (50 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Nickel 270 or Nitinol?

Nitinol is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nickel 270 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Nickel 270 or Nitinol?

Nickel 270. Its machinability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Nitinol; for welding the order is Nickel 270 first (excellent, 85/100) then Nitinol (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Nickel 270 and Nitinol side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.